more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 16190

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / D. Modal Logic ML / 7. Barcan Formula ]

Full Idea

In accordance with the Barcan Formula we assume that if it is possible that Wittgenstein should have had a child, then something or other is possibly Wittgentein's child.

Clarification

Wittgenstein had no children

Gist of Idea

BF implies that if W possibly had a child, then something is possibly W's child

Source

Ori Simchen (The Barcan Formula and Metaphysics [2013], §5)

Book Ref

-: 'Theoria' [-], p.20

A Reaction

Put like this it sounds unpersuasive. What is the something or other? Someone else's child? A dustbin? A bare particular? Wittgenstein's child? If it was the last one, how could it be Wittgenstein's child while only possibly being that thing?

The 25 ideas with the same theme [formula relating possibility to existence]:

16519 No one can conceive of a possible substance, apart from those which God has created [Arnauld]
14976 Reject the Barcan if quantifiers are confined to worlds, and different things exist in other worlds [Cresswell]
16189 The variable domain approach to quantified modal logic invalidates the Barcan Formula [Kripke, by Simchen]
15132 The Barcan formulas fail in models with varying domains [Kripke, by Williamson]
18823 To say there could have been people who don't exist, but deny those possible things, rejects Barcan [Stalnaker, by Rumfitt]
15415 The temporal Barcan formulas fix what exists, which seems absurd [Burgess]
13728 The Barcan says nothing comes into existence; the Converse says nothing ceases; the pair imply stability [Fitting/Mendelsohn]
13729 The Barcan corresponds to anti-monotonicity, and the Converse to monotonicity [Fitting/Mendelsohn]
15130 If a property is possible, there is something which can have it [Williamson]
15135 If the domain of propositional quantification is constant, the Barcan formulas hold [Williamson]
15139 Converse Barcan: could something fail to meet a condition, if everything meets that condition? [Williamson]
13718 The Barcan Formula ∀x□Fx→□∀xFx may be a defect in modal logic [Sider]
13720 Converse Barcan Formula: □∀αφ→∀α□φ [Sider]
13723 System B is needed to prove the Barcan Formula [Sider]
19297 The two Barcan principles are easily proved in fairly basic modal logic [Hale]
19301 With a negative free logic, we can dispense with the Barcan formulae [Hale]
15023 The Barcan schema implies if X might have fathered something, there is something X might have fathered [Sider]
19208 The Converse Barcan implies 'everything exists necessarily' is a consequence of 'necessarily, everything exists' [Merricks]
9449 The plausible Barcan formula implies modality in the actual world [Bird]
18350 Truth-maker theorists should probably reject the converse Barcan formula [Rami]
15380 Barcan:nothing comes into existence; Converse:nothing goes out; Both:domain is unchanging [Vervloesem]
16186 The Barcan Formulas express how to combine modal operators with classical quantifiers [Simchen]
16187 The Barcan Formulas are orthodox, but clash with the attractive Actualist view [Simchen]
16190 BF implies that if W possibly had a child, then something is possibly W's child [Simchen]
19036 The Barcan formula endorses either merely possible things, or makes the unactualised impossible [Vetter]