more from this thinker     |     more from this text

Single Idea 16223

[filed under theme 7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Vagueness / b. Vagueness of reality ]

Full Idea

There is a question of whether there must be 'vagueness all the way down' for the world to be vague. One view is that if there is a base level of precisely describably facts, upon which all the others supervene, then the world is not really vague.

Gist of Idea

Maybe for the world to be vague, it must be vague in its foundations?

Source

Katherine Hawley (How Things Persist [2001], 4.5)

Book Ref

Hawley,Katherine: 'How Things Persist' [OUP 2004], p.116

A Reaction

My understanding of the physics is that it is non-vague all the way down, and then you get to the base level which is hopelessly vague!

The 15 ideas with the same theme [treating some aspects of reality as inherently vague]:

13187 In actual things nothing is indefinite [Leibniz]
21628 To say reality itself is vague is not properly intelligible [Dummett]
6978 Baldness is just hair distribution, but the former is indeterminate, unlike the latter [Jackson]
7987 Nothing is true, but everything is exact [Baudrillard]
16129 Evans argues (falsely!) that a contradiction follows from treating objects as vague [Evans, by Lowe]
16459 Is it coherent that reality is vague, identities can be vague, and objects can have fuzzy boundaries? [Evans]
16460 Evans assumes there can be vague identity statements, and that his proof cannot be right [Evans, by Lewis]
16457 There clearly are vague identity statements, and Evans's argument has a false conclusion [Evans, by Lewis]
8983 If 'red' is vague, then membership of the set of red things is vague, so there is no set of red things [Sainsbury]
9064 Objects such as a cloud or Mount Everest seem to have fuzzy boundaries in nature [Keefe/Smith]
9599 There cannot be vague objects, so there may be no such thing as a mountain [Williamson]
21629 Equally fuzzy objects can be identical, so fuzziness doesn't entail vagueness [Williamson]
16219 Non-linguistic things cannot be indeterminate, because they don't have truth-values at all [Hawley]
16223 Maybe for the world to be vague, it must be vague in its foundations? [Hawley]
6135 A crumbling statue can't become vague, because vagueness is incoherent [Merricks]