more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 16223
[filed under theme 7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Vagueness / b. Vagueness of reality
]
Full Idea
There is a question of whether there must be 'vagueness all the way down' for the world to be vague. One view is that if there is a base level of precisely describably facts, upon which all the others supervene, then the world is not really vague.
Gist of Idea
Maybe for the world to be vague, it must be vague in its foundations?
Source
Katherine Hawley (How Things Persist [2001], 4.5)
Book Ref
Hawley,Katherine: 'How Things Persist' [OUP 2004], p.116
A Reaction
My understanding of the physics is that it is non-vague all the way down, and then you get to the base level which is hopelessly vague!
The
15 ideas
with the same theme
[treating some aspects of reality as inherently vague]:
13187
|
In actual things nothing is indefinite
[Leibniz]
|
21628
|
To say reality itself is vague is not properly intelligible
[Dummett]
|
6978
|
Baldness is just hair distribution, but the former is indeterminate, unlike the latter
[Jackson]
|
7987
|
Nothing is true, but everything is exact
[Baudrillard]
|
16129
|
Evans argues (falsely!) that a contradiction follows from treating objects as vague
[Evans, by Lowe]
|
16459
|
Is it coherent that reality is vague, identities can be vague, and objects can have fuzzy boundaries?
[Evans]
|
16460
|
Evans assumes there can be vague identity statements, and that his proof cannot be right
[Evans, by Lewis]
|
16457
|
There clearly are vague identity statements, and Evans's argument has a false conclusion
[Evans, by Lewis]
|
8983
|
If 'red' is vague, then membership of the set of red things is vague, so there is no set of red things
[Sainsbury]
|
9064
|
Objects such as a cloud or Mount Everest seem to have fuzzy boundaries in nature
[Keefe/Smith]
|
9599
|
There cannot be vague objects, so there may be no such thing as a mountain
[Williamson]
|
21629
|
Equally fuzzy objects can be identical, so fuzziness doesn't entail vagueness
[Williamson]
|
16219
|
Non-linguistic things cannot be indeterminate, because they don't have truth-values at all
[Hawley]
|
16223
|
Maybe for the world to be vague, it must be vague in its foundations?
[Hawley]
|
6135
|
A crumbling statue can't become vague, because vagueness is incoherent
[Merricks]
|