more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
What makes ontological questions meaningless when taken absolutely is not universality but circularity. A question of the form "What is an F?" can only be answered with "An F is a G", which makes sense relative to the uncritical acceptance of G.
Gist of Idea
Absolute ontological questions are meaningless, because the answers are circular definitions
Source
Willard Quine (Ontological Relativity [1968], p.53)
Book Ref
Quine,Willard: 'Ontological Relativity and Other Essays' [Columbia 1969], p.53
A Reaction
This is too precise. No one takes such questions wholly as 'absolutes', but we don't accept G uncritically. We keep going, and the target is not a foundation, but coherence.
8470 | Reference is inscrutable, because we cannot choose between theories of numbers [Quine, by Orenstein] |
18963 | Indeterminacy translating 'rabbit' depends on translating individuation terms [Quine] |
1633 | Absolute ontological questions are meaningless, because the answers are circular definitions [Quine] |
18964 | Ontology is relative to both a background theory and a translation manual [Quine] |
18965 | We know what things are by distinguishing them, so identity is part of ontology [Quine] |
21642 | If quantification is all substitutional, there is no ontology [Quine] |
1634 | Two things are relative - the background theory, and translating the object theory into the background theory [Quine] |