more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 16385

[filed under theme 19. Language / B. Reference / 2. Denoting ]

Full Idea

In Russell's definition of 'denoting', a definite description denotes an entity if that entity fits the description uniquely.

Gist of Idea

A definite description 'denotes' an entity if it fits the description uniquely

Source

report of Bertrand Russell (On Denoting [1905]) by François Recanati - Mental Files 17.2

Book Ref

Recanati,François: 'Mental Files' [OUP 2012], p.226


A Reaction

[Recanati cites Donnellan for this] Hence denoting is not the same thing as reference. A description can denote beautifully, but fail to refer. Donnellan says if denoting were reference, someone might refer without realising it.


The 5 ideas with the same theme [the picking out of some specific thing]:

A definite description 'denotes' an entity if it fits the description uniquely [Russell, by Recanati]
Referring is not denoting, and Russell ignores the referential use of definite descriptions [Donnellan on Russell]
Denoting phrases are meaningless, but guarantee meaning for propositions [Russell]
In 'Scott is the author of Waverley', denotation is identical, but meaning is different [Russell]
Terms denote objects with properties, and statements denote the world with that property [Engelbretsen]