more on this theme     |     more from this thinker

Single Idea 16531

[filed under theme 10. Modality / A. Necessity / 5. Metaphysical Necessity ]

Full Idea

By 'metaphysical' necessity I mean necessity of the strongest possible kind - absolute necessity - and I take it to be an objective kind of necessity, rather than being something mind-dependent.

Gist of Idea

'Metaphysical' necessity is absolute and objective - the strongest kind of necessity

Source

E.J. Lowe (What is the Source of Knowledge of Modal Truths? [2013], 1)

Book Ref

-: 'Mind' [-], p.1

A Reaction

See Bob Hale for the possibility that 'absolute' and 'metaphysical' necessity might come apart. I think I believe in metaphysical necessity, but I'm uneasy about 'absolute' necessity. That may be discredited by the sceptics.

Related Ideas

Idea 15086 Absolute necessity might be achievable either logically or metaphysically [Hale]

Idea 8261 Maybe not-p is logically possible, but p is metaphysically necessary, so the latter is not absolute [Hale]

The 19 ideas from 'What is the Source of Knowledge of Modal Truths?'

16533 Logical necessities, based on laws of logic, are a proper sub-class of metaphysical necessities [Lowe]
16531 'Metaphysical' necessity is absolute and objective - the strongest kind of necessity [Lowe]
16532 'Epistemic' necessity is better called 'certainty' [Lowe]
16534 'Intuitions' are just unreliable 'hunches'; over centuries intuitions change enormously [Lowe]
16535 A concept is a way of thinking of things or kinds, whether or not they exist [Lowe]
16542 Explanation can't give an account of essence, because it is too multi-faceted [Lowe]
16547 H2O isn't necessary, because different laws of nature might affect how O and H combine [Lowe]
16543 If an essence implies p, then p is an essential truth, and hence metaphysically necessary [Lowe]
16544 Metaphysical necessity is either an essential truth, or rests on essential truths [Lowe]
16538 We could give up possible worlds if we based necessity on essences [Lowe]
16539 A definition of a circle will show what it is, and show its generating principle [Lowe]
16540 Defining an ellipse by conic sections reveals necessities, but not the essence of an ellipse [Lowe]
16548 An essence is what an entity is, revealed by a real definition; this is not an entity in its own right [Lowe]
16549 Simple things like 'red' can be given real ostensive definitions [Lowe]
16545 The essence of lumps and statues shows that two objects coincide but are numerically distinct [Lowe]
16546 The essence of a bronze statue shows that it could be made of different bronze [Lowe]
16551 Grasping an essence is just grasping a real definition [Lowe]
16552 If we must know some entity to know an essence, we lack a faculty to do that [Lowe]
16550 Direct reference doesn't seem to require that thinkers know what it is they are thinking about [Lowe]