more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 16577

[filed under theme 14. Science / A. Basis of Science / 2. Demonstration ]

Full Idea

Inductions are not demonstrations, because they do not conclude on account of their form, since it is not possible to make an induction from all cases.

Gist of Idea

Induction is not demonstration, because not all of the instances can be observed

Source

Jean Buridan (Questions on Aristotle's Physics [1346], I.15 f. 18vb), quoted by Robert Pasnau - Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 02.3

Book Ref

Pasnau,Robert: 'Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671' [OUP 2011], p.23


A Reaction

Thus showing that demonstration really is meant to be as conclusive as a mathematical proof, and that Aristotle seems to think such a thing is possible in physical science.


The 4 ideas from 'Questions on Aristotle's Physics'

A thing is (less properly) the same over time if each part is succeeded by another [Buridan]
Induction is not demonstration, because not all of the instances can be observed [Buridan]
Science is based on induction, for general truths about fire, rhubarb and magnets [Buridan]
Without magnitude a thing would retain its parts, but they would have no location [Buridan]