more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 16595

[filed under theme 27. Natural Reality / E. Cosmology / 2. Eternal Universe ]

Full Idea

If some one of the things 'which are' is constantly disappearing, why has not the whole of 'what is' been used up long ago and vanished away - assuming of course that the material of all the several comings-to-be was infinite?

Gist of Idea

If each thing can cease to be, why hasn't absolutely everything ceased to be long ago?

Source

Aristotle (Coming-to-be and Passing-away (Gen/Corr) [c.335 BCE], 318a17)

Book Ref

Aristotle: 'The Basic Works of Aristotle', ed/tr. McKeon,Richard [Modern Library Classics 2001], p.480


A Reaction

This thought is the basis of Aquinas's Third Way for proving the existence of God (as the force which prevents the vicissitudes of nature from sliding into oblivion).

Related Ideas

Idea 14029 If disappearing things went to nothingness, nothing could return, and it would all be gone by now [Epicurus]


The 25 ideas from 'Coming-to-be and Passing-away (Gen/Corr)'

Unobservant thinkers tend to dogmatise using insufficient facts [Aristotle]
Wood is potentially divided through and through, so what is there in the wood besides the division? [Aristotle]
If a body is endlessly divided, is it reduced to nothing - then reassembled from nothing? [Aristotle]
True change is in a thing's logos or its matter, not in its qualities [Aristotle]
A change in qualities is mere alteration, not true change [Aristotle]
Does the pure 'this' come to be, or the 'this-such', or 'so-great', or 'somewhere'? [Aristotle]
Philosophers have worried about coming-to-be from nothing pre-existing [Aristotle]
If each thing can cease to be, why hasn't absolutely everything ceased to be long ago? [Aristotle]
Infinity is only potential, never actual [Aristotle]
All comings-to-be are passings-away, and vice versa [Aristotle]
The substratum changing to a contrary is the material cause of coming-to-be [Aristotle]
If the substratum persists, it is 'alteration'; if it doesn't, it is 'coming-to-be' or 'passing-away' [Aristotle]
If a perceptible substratum persists, it is 'alteration'; coming-to-be is a complete change [Aristotle]
Matter is the substratum, which supports both coming-to-be and alteration [Aristotle]
Matter is the limit of points and lines, and must always have quality and form [Aristotle]
Bodies are endlessly divisible [Aristotle]
Existence is either potential or actual [Aristotle]
The primary matter is the substratum for the contraries like hot and cold [Aristotle]
Which of the contrary features of a body are basic to it? [Aristotle]
The Four Elements must change into one another, or else alteration is impossible [Aristotle]
Fire is hot and dry; Air is hot and moist; Water is cold and moist; Earth is cold and dry [Aristotle]
There couldn't be just one element, which was both water and air at the same time [Aristotle]
An Order controls all things [Aristotle]
Being is better than not-being [Aristotle]
There is no time without movement [Aristotle]