more on this theme | more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
The unitarian view of substance says it cannot be divided. If the clay can survive the destruction of the statue, then that shows that the statue was not a substance at all, and that its shape (or whatever made it a statue) was merely a passing accident.
Gist of Idea
If clay survives destruction of the statue, the statue wasn't a substance, but a mere accident
Source
Robert Pasnau (Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 [2011], 25.3)
Book Ref
Pasnau,Robert: 'Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671' [OUP 2011], p.584
A Reaction
This seems to give the orthodox Aristotelian/Thomist reading, assuming that a substance only has one form, which unifies it. Since clay must have shape, and statues must have matter, I have never understood how there were two objects here.
Related Idea
Idea 15766 Megaran actualism is just scepticism about the qualities of things [Aristotle]