more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 16850

[filed under theme 14. Science / D. Explanation / 1. Explanation / a. Explanation ]

Full Idea

Explanation is a partial answer to the descriptive problem of induction, …but the justificatory problem is recalcitrant, since it may seem particularly implausible that explanatory considerations should be a reliable guide to truth.

Gist of Idea

Explanation may describe induction, but may not show how it justifies, or leads to truth

Source

Peter Lipton (Inference to the Best Explanation (2nd) [2004], 09 'Voltaire's')

Book Ref

Lipton,Peter: 'Inference to the Best Explanation (2nd ed)' [Routledge 2004], p.142


A Reaction

His claim that explanation is a guide to inference is intended to bridge the gap. One might say that a good explanation has to be true, so just make sure your explanation is 'good', according to a few criteria.


The 18 ideas with the same theme [general ideas about the concept of explanation]:

Universal principles are not primary beings, but particular principles are not universally knowable [Aristotle]
What is most universal is furthest away, and the particulars are nearest [Aristotle]
Universals are valuable because they make the explanations plain [Aristotle]
Are particulars explained more by universals, or by other particulars? [Aristotle]
Aristotelian explanations are facts, while modern explanations depend on human conceptions [Aristotle, by Politis]
All knowledge and explanation rests on the inexplicable [Schopenhauer]
Surprisingly, empiricists before Mill ignore explanation, which seems to transcend experience [Mill, by Ruben]
Explanations have states of affairs as their objects [Chisholm]
Explanations typically relate statements, not events [Davidson]
Explanatory exclusion: there cannot be two separate complete explanations of a single event [Kim]
Usually explanations just involve giving information, with no reference to the act of explanation [Ruben]
Hume allows interpolation, even though it and extrapolation are not actually valid [Molnar]
Explanation may describe induction, but may not show how it justifies, or leads to truth [Lipton]
Explanations must cite generalisations [Sider]
People tend to be satisfied with shallow explanations [Gelman]
We talk both of 'people' explaining things, and of 'facts' explaining things [Bird]
The objective component of explanations is the things that must exist for the explanation [Bird]
'Because' can signal an inference rather than an explanation [Liggins]