more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 16891

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 8. Theories in Logic ]

Full Idea

Gödel undermined Frege's assumption that all but the basic truths are provable in a system, but insofar as one conceives of proof informally as an epistemic ordering among truths, one can see his vision as worth developing.

Gist of Idea

Despite Gödel, Frege's epistemic ordering of all the truths is still plausible

Source

report of Gottlob Frege (Grundlagen der Arithmetik (Foundations) [1884]) by Tyler Burge - Frege on Apriority (with ps) 1

Book Ref

Burge,Tyler: 'Truth, Thought, Reason (on Frege)' [OUP 2001], p.361


A Reaction

[compressed] This 'epistemic ordering' fits my thesis of seeing the world through our explanations of it.


The 9 ideas with the same theme [complete sets of propositions derived from some start]:

Despite Gödel, Frege's epistemic ordering of all the truths is still plausible [Frege, by Burge]
The primitive simples of arithmetic are the essence, determining the subject, and its boundaries [Frege, by Jeshion]
'Theorems' are both proved, and used in proofs [Frege]
To study formal systems, look at the whole thing, and not just how it is constructed in steps [Curry]
A 'theorem' of a theory is a sentence derived from the axioms using the proof system [Smith,P]
Theories in logic are sentences closed under consequence, but in truth discussions theories have axioms [Fine,K]
A theory is logically closed, which means infinite premisses [Read]
A theory is 'non-conservative' if it facilitates new mathematical proofs [Horsten]
A theory is some formulae and all of their consequences [Halbach]