more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 16903

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / d. Rational foundations ]

Full Idea

Frege thought that the relations of epistemic justification in a science mirrors the natural ordering of truths: in particular, what is self-evident is selbstverstandlich.

Clarification

'selbstverstandlich' means self-standing, or foundational

Gist of Idea

Justifications show the ordering of truths, and the foundation is what is self-evident

Source

report of Gottlob Frege (Grundlagen der Arithmetik (Foundations) [1884], §02) by Robin Jeshion - Frege's Notion of Self-Evidence 1

Book Ref

-: 'Mind' [-], p.944


A Reaction

I'm not sure that I can accept a 'natural ordering of truths'. Is there a natural ordering of the facts of the world? The most I can see is a direction to causation. Maybe inferences have a direction, but humans intrude on those.


The 8 ideas with the same theme [reson is the foundation for knowledge]:

A presentation is true if we judge that no false presentation could appear like it [Zeno of Citium, by Cicero]
Our thoughts are either dependent, or self-evident. All thoughts seem to end in the self-evident [Leibniz]
Justifications show the ordering of truths, and the foundation is what is self-evident [Frege, by Jeshion]
Some features of a thought are known directly, but others must be inferred [Sosa]
A priori justification requires understanding but no experience [Bonjour]
You can't explain away a priori justification as analyticity, and you can't totally give it up [Bonjour]
A priori justification can vary in degree [Bonjour]
Reason cannot be an ultimate foundation, because rational justification requires prior beliefs [Pollock/Cruz]