more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 16936

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / B. Natural Kinds / 1. Natural Kinds ]

Full Idea

With the triadic relation of comparative similarity, kinds can contain one another, as well as overlapping. Red and colored things can both count as kinds. Colored things all resemble one another, even though less than red things do.

Gist of Idea

Comparative similarity allows the kind 'colored' to contain the kind 'red'

Source

Willard Quine (Natural Kinds [1969], p.119)

Book Ref

Quine,Willard: 'Ontological Relativity and Other Essays' [Columbia 1969], p.119


A Reaction

[compressed] Quine claims that comparative similarity is necessary for kinds - that there be some 'foil' in a similarity - that A is more like C than B is.

Related Idea

Idea 16935 If similarity has no degrees, kinds cannot be contained within one another [Quine]


The 20 ideas with the same theme [general ideas about natural kinds]:

Unusual kinds like mule are just a combination of two kinds [Aristotle]
Chemists rely on a single experiment to establish a fact; repetition is pointless [Peirce]
Quine probably regrets natural kinds now being treated as essences [Quine, by Dennett]
If similarity has no degrees, kinds cannot be contained within one another [Quine]
Comparative similarity allows the kind 'colored' to contain the kind 'red' [Quine]
The natural kinds are objects, processes and properties/relations [Ellis]
Natural kinds are of objects/substances, or events/processes, or intrinsic natures [Ellis]
Science rests on the principle that nature is a hierarchy of natural kinds [Harré]
Some kinds are very explanatory, but others less so, and some not at all [Devitt]
Phylogenetics involves history, and cladism rests species on splits in lineage [Dupré]
Kinds don't do anything (including evolve) because they are abstract [Dupré]
Natural kinds are those that we use in induction [Bird]
Rubies and sapphires are both corundum, with traces of metals varying their colours [Bird]
Tin is not one natural kind, but appears to be 21, depending on isotope [Bird]
Membership of a purely random collection cannot be used as an explanation [Bird]
Natural kinds may overlap, or be sub-kinds of one another [Bird]
Natural kinds are what are differentiated by nature, and not just by us [Scerri]
If elements are natural kinds, might the groups of the periodic table also be natural kinds? [Scerri]
The Kripke/Putnam approach to natural kind terms seems to give them excessive stability [Koslicki]
Artifacts can be natural kinds, when they are the object of historical enquiry [Machery]