more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 16978

[filed under theme 10. Modality / D. Knowledge of Modality / 4. Conceivable as Possible / a. Conceivable as possible ]

Full Idea

Maybe conceivability could be understood as a priori coherence, which implies possibility.

Gist of Idea

If conceivability is a priori coherence, that implies possibility

Source

Tuomas E. Tahko (The Epistemology of Essence (draft) [2013], 3.2)


A Reaction

I'm not quite sure why 'a priori' has to be there. Assessing conceivability just is assessing coherence. That couches it as a rational activity, rather than as a purely imaginary one. Trying to conceive a square circle isn't just daydreaming.


The 4 ideas from Tuomas E. Tahko

Essences are used to explain natural kinds, modality, and causal powers [Tahko]
Scientific essentialists tend to characterise essence in terms of modality (not vice versa) [Tahko]
If essence is modal and laws are necessary, essentialist knowledge is found by scientists [Tahko]
If conceivability is a priori coherence, that implies possibility [Tahko]