more on this theme | more from this thinker | more from this text
Full Idea
Two totally distinct 'historical chains' that be sheer accident assign the same name to the same man should probably count as creating distinct names despite the identity of the referents.
Gist of Idea
A man has two names if the historical chains are different - even if they are the same!
Source
Saul A. Kripke (Naming and Necessity preface [1980], p.08 n9)
Book Ref
Kripke,Saul: 'Naming and Necessity' [Blackwell 1980], p.8
A Reaction
A nice puzzle for his own theory. 'What's you name?' 'Alice, and Alice!'