more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
The theory of the expansion of the universe renders the red shift no longer puzzling, whereas he expansion of the universe is hardly rendered less puzzling by facts about the red shift.
Clarification
The 'red shift' is in the light coming from galaxies
Gist of Idea
Universe expansion explains the red shift, but not vice versa
Source
J.J.C. Smart (Explanation - Opening Address [1990], p.15)
Book Ref
'Explanation and Its Limits', ed/tr. Knowles,Dudley [CUP 1990], p.15
A Reaction
The direction of explanation is, I take it, made obvious by the direction of causation, with questions about what is 'puzzling' as mere side-effects.
17061 | Explanation of a fact is fitting it into a system of beliefs [Smart] |
17062 | If scientific explanation is causal, that rules out mathematical explanation [Smart] |
17063 | Unlike Newton, Einstein's general theory explains the perihelion of Mercury [Smart] |
17070 | Coherence is consilience, simplicity, analogy, and fitting into a web of belief [Smart] |
17072 | We need comprehensiveness, as well as self-coherence [Smart] |
17071 | An explanation is better if it also explains phenomena from a different field [Smart] |
17073 | I simply reject evidence, if it is totally contrary to my web of belief [Smart] |
17074 | Explanations are bad by fitting badly with a web of beliefs, or fitting well into a bad web [Smart] |
17075 | Scientific explanation tends to reduce things to the unfamiliar (not the familiar) [Smart] |
17076 | Deducing from laws is one possible way to achieve a coherent explanation [Smart] |
17077 | The height of a flagpole could be fixed by its angle of shadow, but that would be very unusual [Smart] |
17078 | Universe expansion explains the red shift, but not vice versa [Smart] |