more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 17266

[filed under theme 1. Philosophy / E. Nature of Metaphysics / 1. Nature of Metaphysics ]

Full Idea

In the heyday of modal logic, philosophers typically tried to account for any metaphysical notions in modal terms.

Gist of Idea

Using modal logic, philosophers tried to handle all metaphysics in modal terms

Source

Correia,F/Schnieder,B (Grounding: an opinionated introduction [2012], 2.4)

Book Ref

'Metaphysical Grounding', ed/tr. Correia,F/Schnieder,B [CUP 2012], p.10


A Reaction

Lewisian realism about possible worlds actually gets rid of purely 'modal' terms, but I suppose they include possible worlds in their remark. Annoying for modal logicians to be told they had a 'heyday' - a nice example of the rhetoric of philosophy.


The 5 ideas from 'Grounding: an opinionated introduction'

Why do rationalists accept Sufficient Reason, when it denies the existence of fundamental facts? [Correia/Schnieder]
Using modal logic, philosophers tried to handle all metaphysics in modal terms [Correia/Schnieder]
The identity of two facts may depend on how 'fine-grained' we think facts are [Correia/Schnieder]
Grounding is metaphysical and explanation epistemic, so keep them apart [Correia/Schnieder]
Is existential dependence by grounding, or do grounding claims arise from existential dependence? [Correia/Schnieder]