more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 17520

[filed under theme 7. Existence / B. Change in Existence / 4. Events / a. Nature of events ]

Full Idea

In order to know which event has been ostensively identified by a speaker, the auditor must know the limits intended by the speaker. ...Events do not have natural boundaries.

Gist of Idea

Events do not have natural boundaries, and we have to set them

Source

M.R. Ayers (Individuals without Sortals [1974], 'Concl')

Book Ref

-: 'Canadian Journal of Philosophy' [-], p.144


A Reaction

He distinguishes events thus from natural objects, where the world, to a large extent, offers us the boundaries. Nice point.


The 15 ideas from M.R. Ayers

Recognising continuity is separate from sortals, and must precede their use [Ayers]
Speakers need the very general category of a thing, if they are to think about it [Ayers]
Some say a 'covering concept' completes identity; others place the concept in the reference [Ayers]
You can't have the concept of a 'stage' if you lack the concept of an object [Ayers]
We use sortals to classify physical objects by the nature and origin of their unity [Ayers]
Sortals basically apply to individuals [Ayers]
Events do not have natural boundaries, and we have to set them [Ayers]
To express borderline cases of objects, you need the concept of an 'object' [Ayers]
Counting 'coin in this box' may have coin as the unit, with 'in this box' merely as the scope [Ayers]
Temporal 'parts' cannot be separated or rearranged [Ayers]
If diachronic identities need covering concepts, why not synchronic identities too? [Ayers]
If there are two objects, then 'that marble, man-shaped object' is ambiguous [Ayers]
Seeing caterpillar and moth as the same needs continuity, not identity of sortal concepts [Ayers]
Could the same matter have more than one form or principle of unity? [Ayers]
If counting needs a sortal, what of things which fall under two sortals? [Ayers]