more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 17523

[filed under theme 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 5. Essence as Kind ]

Full Idea

Sortals, in their primitive use, apply to the individual.

Gist of Idea

Sortals basically apply to individuals

Source

M.R. Ayers (Individuals without Sortals [1974], 'Concl')

Book Ref

-: 'Canadian Journal of Philosophy' [-], p.147


A Reaction

If the sortal applies to the individual, any essence must pertain to that individual, and not to the class it has been placed in.


The 15 ideas from 'Individuals without Sortals'

Recognising continuity is separate from sortals, and must precede their use [Ayers]
Speakers need the very general category of a thing, if they are to think about it [Ayers]
Some say a 'covering concept' completes identity; others place the concept in the reference [Ayers]
You can't have the concept of a 'stage' if you lack the concept of an object [Ayers]
We use sortals to classify physical objects by the nature and origin of their unity [Ayers]
Sortals basically apply to individuals [Ayers]
Events do not have natural boundaries, and we have to set them [Ayers]
To express borderline cases of objects, you need the concept of an 'object' [Ayers]
Counting 'coin in this box' may have coin as the unit, with 'in this box' merely as the scope [Ayers]
Temporal 'parts' cannot be separated or rearranged [Ayers]
If diachronic identities need covering concepts, why not synchronic identities too? [Ayers]
If there are two objects, then 'that marble, man-shaped object' is ambiguous [Ayers]
Seeing caterpillar and moth as the same needs continuity, not identity of sortal concepts [Ayers]
Could the same matter have more than one form or principle of unity? [Ayers]
If counting needs a sortal, what of things which fall under two sortals? [Ayers]