more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 17613

[filed under theme 18. Thought / A. Modes of Thought / 6. Judgement / a. Nature of Judgement ]

Full Idea

Principles must be judged from the point of view of science, and not science from the point of view of principles fixed once and for all. Geometry existed before Euclid's 'Elements', just as arithmetic and set theory did before Peano's 'Formulaire'.

Gist of Idea

We should judge principles by the science, not science by some fixed principles

Source

Ernst Zermelo (New Proof of Possibility of Well-Ordering [1908], §2a)

Book Ref

'From Frege to Gödel 1879-1931', ed/tr. Heijenoort,Jean van [Harvard 1967], p.189


A Reaction

This shows why the axiomatisation of set theory is an ongoing and much-debated activity.


The 20 ideas with the same theme [how we evaluate truth and falsehood]:

Stoics said that correct judgement needs an invincible criterion of truth [Stoic school, by Fogelin]
If we utter three steps of a logical argument, they never exist together [Sext.Empiricus]
First grasp what it is, then its essential features; judgement is their compounding and division [Aquinas]
Judgement is distinguishing concepts, and seeing their relations [Fichte, by Siep]
We don't judge by combining subject and concept; we get a concept by splitting up a judgement [Frege]
The multiple relations theory says assertions about propositions are about their ingredients [Russell/Whitehead, by Linsky,B]
A judgement is a complex entity, of mind and various objects [Russell/Whitehead]
The meaning of 'Socrates is human' is completed by a judgement [Russell/Whitehead]
The multiple relation theory of judgement couldn't explain the unity of sentences [Morris,M on Russell/Whitehead]
Only the act of judging completes the meaning of a statement [Russell/Whitehead]
Knowledge of truths applies to judgements; knowledge by acquaintance applies to sensations and things [Russell]
Russell's 'multiple relations' theory says beliefs attach to ingredients, not to propositions [Russell, by Linsky,B]
Truth is when a mental state corresponds to a complex unity of external constituents [Russell]
We should judge principles by the science, not science by some fixed principles [Zermelo]
If you like judgments and reject propositions, what are the relata of incoherence in a judgment? [Ryle]
If all beliefs are propositional, then belief and judgement are the same thing [Monk]
Concepts are distinguished by roles in judgement, and are thus tied to rationality [Peacocke]
Traditionally there are twelve categories of judgement, in groups of three [Potter]
Judgement is always predicating a property of a subject [Beall/Restall]
Judgements can be unreflective and non-inferential, yet rational, by being sensitive to experience [Fricker,M]