more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
If there is but one world, it embraces a multiplicity of contrasting aspects; if there are many worlds, the collection of them all is one. One world may be taken as many, or many worlds taken as one; whether one or many depends on the way of taking.
Gist of Idea
If the world is one it has many aspects, and if there are many worlds they will collect into one
Source
Nelson Goodman (Ways of Worldmaking [1978], 1.2)
Book Ref
Goodman,Nelson: 'Ways of Worldmaking' [Hackett 1984], p.2
A Reaction
He cites 'The Pluralistic Universe' by William James for this idea. The idea is that the distinction 'evaporates under analysis'. Parmenides seems to have thought that no features could be distinguished in the true One.
17650 | We lack frames of reference to transform physics, biology and psychology into one another [Goodman] |
17649 | If the world is one it has many aspects, and if there are many worlds they will collect into one [Goodman] |
17651 | Without words or other symbols, we have no world [Goodman] |
17654 | A world can be full of variety or not, depending on how we sort it [Goodman] |
17653 | Things can only be judged the 'same' by citing some respect of sameness [Goodman] |
17655 | Grue and green won't be in the same world, as that would block induction entirely [Goodman] |
17656 | Being primitive or prior always depends on a constructional system [Goodman] |
17657 | We build our world, and ignore anything that won't fit [Goodman] |
17658 | Users of digital thermometers recognise no temperatures in the gaps [Goodman] |
17652 | Truth is irrelevant if no statements are involved [Goodman] |
17659 | Reality is largely a matter of habit [Goodman] |
17660 | Discovery is often just finding a fit, like a jigsaw puzzle [Goodman] |
17661 | We don't recognise patterns - we invent them [Goodman] |