more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 17690

[filed under theme 26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 2. Types of Laws ]

Full Idea

Three degress of law: 1) 'Oaken laws' where all Fs that aren't Hs are Gs; 2) 'Iron' laws where all Fs are Gs; and 3) 'Steel' laws where all Fs must be Gs.

Gist of Idea

Oaken conditional laws, Iron universal laws, and Steel necessary laws

Source

report of David M. Armstrong (What is a Law of Nature? [1983], 10.4) by PG - Db (ideas)

Book Ref

Armstrong,D.M.: 'What is a Law of Nature?' [CUP 1985], p.148


A Reaction

[My summary of Armstrong's distinction] One response is to say that all laws are actually Oaken - see Mumfor and Mumford/Lill Anjum. It's all ceteris paribus.


The 11 ideas with the same theme [possibility divisions of laws of nature into types]:

Seven theories in science: mechanics, heat, electricity, quantum, particles, relativity, life [Heisenberg, by PG]
Some laws are causal (Ohm's Law), but others are conceptual principles (conservation of energy) [Wright,GHv]
Oaken conditional laws, Iron universal laws, and Steel necessary laws [Armstrong, by PG]
Least action is not a causal law, but a 'global law', describing a global essence [Ellis]
Laws can come from data, from theory, from imagination and concepts, or from procedures [Harré]
Are laws of nature about events, or types and universals, or dispositions, or all three? [Harré]
Are laws about what has or might happen, or do they also cover all the possibilities? [Harré]
Laws are either 'strict', or they involve a 'ceteris paribus' clause [Kim]
There are fundamental explanatory laws (false!), and phenomenological laws (regularities) [Cartwright,N, by Bird]
Laws of appearances are 'phenomenological'; laws of reality are 'theoretical' [Cartwright,N]
Laws are either disposition regularities, or relations between properties [Bird]