more from this thinker
|
more from this text
Single Idea 17691
[filed under theme 8. Modes of Existence / A. Relations / 4. Formal Relations / a. Types of relation
]
Full Idea
I believe that nothing is genuinely related to itself.
Gist of Idea
Nothing is genuinely related to itself
Source
David M. Armstrong (What is a Law of Nature? [1983], 10.7)
Book Ref
Armstrong,D.M.: 'What is a Law of Nature?' [CUP 1985], p.156
The
12 ideas
with the same theme
[ways relations can be categorised and formalised]:
|
14430
|
If a relation is symmetrical and transitive, it has to be reflexive
[Russell]
|
|
14432
|
'Asymmetry' is incompatible with its converse; a is husband of b, so b can't be husband of a
[Russell]
|
|
10586
|
'Reflexiveness' holds between a term and itself, and cannot be inferred from symmetry and transitiveness
[Russell]
|
|
17691
|
Nothing is genuinely related to itself
[Armstrong]
|
|
14974
|
A relation is 'Euclidean' if aRb and aRc imply bRc
[Cresswell]
|
|
13543
|
A relation is not reflexive, just because it is transitive and symmetrical
[Bostock]
|
|
13802
|
Relations can be one-many (at most one on the left) or many-one (at most one on the right)
[Bostock]
|
|
11927
|
Reflexive relations are syntactically polyadic but ontologically monadic
[Molnar]
|
|
18361
|
A reflexive relation entails that the relation can't be asymmetric
[David]
|
|
21352
|
'Multigrade' relations are those lacking a fixed number of relata
[MacBride]
|
|
13043
|
A relation is a set consisting entirely of ordered pairs
[Potter]
|
|
7967
|
Being taller is an external relation, but properties and substances have internal relations
[Macdonald,C]
|