more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
In what is perhaps the most popular version of coherentism, a system of beliefs is a set of beliefs that explain one another.
Gist of Idea
The most popular view is that coherent beliefs explain one another
Source
Edwin D. Mares (A Priori [2011], 01.5)
Book Ref
Mares,Edwin: 'A Priori' [Acumen 2011], p.6
A Reaction
These seems too simple. My first response would be that explanations are what result from coherence sets of beliefs. I may have beliefs that explain nothing, but at least have the virtue of being coherent.
| 17700 | The most popular view is that coherent beliefs explain one another [Mares] |
| 17701 | Possible worlds semantics has a nice compositional account of modal statements [Mares] |
| 17702 | Unstructured propositions are sets of possible worlds; structured ones have components [Mares] |
| 17704 | Operationalism defines concepts by our ways of measuring them [Mares] |
| 17703 | Light in straight lines is contingent a priori; stipulated as straight, because they happen to be so [Mares] |
| 17705 | Empiricists say rationalists mistake imaginative powers for modal insights [Mares] |
| 17706 | The essence of a concept is either its definition or its conceptual relations? [Mares] |
| 17708 | Maybe space has points, but processes always need regions with a size [Mares] |
| 17710 | Aristotelian justification uses concepts abstracted from experience [Mares] |
| 17713 | After 1903, Husserl avoids metaphysical commitments [Mares] |
| 17714 | Aristotelians dislike the idea of a priori judgements from pure reason [Mares] |
| 17715 | The truth of the axioms doesn't matter for pure mathematics, but it does for applied [Mares] |
| 17716 | Mathematics is relations between properties we abstract from experience [Mares] |