more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 17873

[filed under theme 18. Thought / C. Content / 5. Twin Earth ]

Full Idea

It is a blindspot to say that to be a tiger one must come from tigers, but to be water one needn't come from water. ...The error lies in not appreciating that to be water one still must come from somewhere in the cosmos, indeed, from hydrogen and oxygen.

Gist of Idea

Water must be related to water, just as tigers must be related to tigers

Source

Joseph Almog (Nature Without Essence [2010], 09)

Book Ref

-: 'Journal of Philosophy' [-], p.373


A Reaction

A unified picture is indeed desirable, but a better solution is to say that the essence of a tiger is in its structure, not in its origins. There are many ways to produce an artefact. There could be many ways to produce a tiger.

Related Idea

Idea 17870 Alien 'tigers' can't be tigers if they are not related to our tigers [Almog]


The 12 ideas from 'Nature Without Essence'

Defining an essence comes no where near giving a thing's nature [Almog]
Essences promise to reveal reality, but actually drive us away from it [Almog]
Essential definition aims at existence conditions and structural truths [Almog]
If a concept is not compact, it will not be presentable to finite minds [Almog]
Surface accounts aren't exhaustive as they always allow unintended twin cases [Almog]
Kripke and Putnam offer an intermediary between real and nominal essences [Almog]
Fregean meanings are analogous to conceptual essence, defining a kind [Almog]
Definitionalists rely on snapshot-concepts, instead of on the real processes [Almog]
Water must be related to water, just as tigers must be related to tigers [Almog]
Alien 'tigers' can't be tigers if they are not related to our tigers [Almog]
Individual essences are just cobbled together classificatory predicates [Almog]
The number series is primitive, not the result of some set theoretic axioms [Almog]