more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 17977

[filed under theme 18. Thought / D. Concepts / 4. Structure of Concepts / e. Concepts from exemplars ]

Full Idea

In the exemplar view of concepts, the idea that people have a representation that somehow encompasses an entire concept is rejected. ...Instead a person's concept of dogs is the set of dogs that the person remembers.

Gist of Idea

The exemplar view of concepts says 'dogs' is the set of dogs I remember

Source

Gregory L. Murphy (The Big Book of Concepts [2004], Ch. 3)

Book Ref

Murphy,Gregory L.: 'The Big Book of Concepts' [MIT 2004], p.49


A Reaction

[The theory was introduced by Medin and Schaffer 1978] I think I have finally met a plausible theory of concepts. When I think 'dog' I conjure up a fuzz of dogs that exhibit the range I have encountered (e.g. tiny to very big). Individuals come first!

Related Ideas

Idea 17976 Prototypes are unified representations of the entire category (rather than of members) [Murphy]

Idea 17981 Children using knowing and essentialist categories doesn't fit the exemplar view [Murphy]


The 24 ideas from 'The Big Book of Concepts'

The theoretical and practical definitions for the classical view are very hard to find [Murphy]
The classical definitional approach cannot distinguish typical and atypical category members [Murphy]
Classical concepts follow classical logic, but concepts in real life don't work that way [Murphy]
Classical concepts are transitive hierarchies, but actual categories may be intransitive [Murphy]
The classical core is meant to be the real concept, but actually seems unimportant [Murphy]
The most popular theories of concepts are based on prototypes or exemplars [Murphy]
The exemplar view of concepts says 'dogs' is the set of dogs I remember [Murphy]
We do not learn concepts in isolation, but as an integrated part of broader knowledge [Murphy]
There is no 'ideal' bird or dog, and prototypes give no information about variability [Murphy]
Prototypes are unified representations of the entire category (rather than of members) [Murphy]
The prototype theory uses observed features, but can't include their construction [Murphy]
Concepts with familiar contents are easier to learn [Murphy]
Some knowledge is involved in instant use of categories, other knowledge in explanations [Murphy]
People categorise things consistent with their knowledge, even rejecting some good evidence [Murphy]
Induction is said to just compare properties of categories, but the type of property also matters [Murphy]
The main theories of concepts are exemplar, prototype and knowledge [Murphy]
Research shows perceptual discrimination is sharper at category boundaries [Murphy]
Exemplar theory struggles with hierarchical classification and with induction [Murphy]
Children using knowing and essentialist categories doesn't fit the exemplar view [Murphy]
Conceptual combination must be compositional, and can't be built up from exemplars [Murphy]
The concept of birds from exemplars must also be used in inductions about birds [Murphy]
The prototype theory handles hierarchical categories and combinations of concepts well [Murphy]
Prototypes theory of concepts is best, as a full description with weighted typical features [Murphy]
Learning concepts is forming prototypes with a knowledge structure [Murphy]