more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18000

[filed under theme 19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 4. Compositionality ]

Full Idea

A weaker principle of compositionality states that if a syntactically well-formed sentence is meaningful, then its meaning is a function of the meaning of its parts.

Gist of Idea

Weaker compositionality says meaningful well-formed sentences get the meaning from the parts

Source

Ofra Magidor (Category Mistakes [2013], 1.1)

Book Ref

Magidor,Ofra: 'Category Mistakes' [OUP 2013], p.5


A Reaction

I would certainly accept this as being correct. I take the meaning of a sentence to be something which you assemble in your head as you hear the parts of it unfold. ….However, irony might exhibit meaning that only comes from the whole sentence. Hm.

Related Idea

Idea 17999 Strong compositionality says meaningful expressions syntactically well-formed are meaningful [Magidor]


The 16 ideas with the same theme [sentence meaning as built up from its components]:

Frege's account was top-down and decompositional, not bottom-up and compositional [Frege, by Potter]
Propositions are understood via their constituents [Wittgenstein]
Propositions use old expressions for a new sense [Wittgenstein]
Compositionality explains how long sentences work, and truth conditions are the main compositional feature [Davidson, by Lycan]
If you assign semantics to sentence parts, the sentence fails to compose a whole [Davidson]
Encountering novel sentences shows conclusively that meaning must be compositional [Peacocke]
The content of an assertion can be quite different from compositional content [Yablo]
Negative existentials with compositionality make the whole sentence meaningless [Read]
Compositonality is a way to build up the truth-conditions of a sentence [Hofweber]
Compositionality should rely on the parsing tree, which may contain more than sentence components [Potter]
'Direct compositonality' says the components wholly explain a sentence meaning [Potter]
Compositionality is more welcome in logic than in linguistics (which is more contextual) [Potter]
Weaker compositionality says meaningful well-formed sentences get the meaning from the parts [Magidor]
Strong compositionality says meaningful expressions syntactically well-formed are meaningful [Magidor]
Understanding unlimited numbers of sentences suggests that meaning is compositional [Magidor]
Semantic theories show how truth of sentences depends on rules for interpreting and joining their parts [Schroeter]