more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18122

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / E. Nonclassical Logics / 2. Intuitionist Logic ]

Full Idea

None of the classical ways of defining one logical constant in terms of others is available in intuitionist logic (and this includes the two quantifiers).

Gist of Idea

Classical interdefinitions of logical constants and quantifiers is impossible in intuitionism

Source

David Bostock (Philosophy of Mathematics [2009], 7.2)

Book Ref

Bostock,David: 'Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction' [Wiley-Blackwell 2009], p.214


The 15 ideas with the same theme [logic which uses 'provable' in place of 'true']:

Mathematical statements and entities that result from an infinite process must lack a truth-value [Dummett]
Dummett says classical logic rests on meaning as truth, while intuitionist logic rests on assertability [Dummett, by Kitcher]
Classical interdefinitions of logical constants and quantifiers is impossible in intuitionism [Bostock]
Intuitionists rely on assertability instead of truth, but assertability relies on truth [Kitcher]
Is classical logic a part of intuitionist logic, or vice versa? [Burgess]
It is still unsettled whether standard intuitionist logic is complete [Burgess]
You can employ intuitionist logic without intuitionism about mathematics [Sider]
Intuitionist logic looks best as natural deduction [Mares]
Intuitionism as natural deduction has no rule for negation [Mares]
(∀x)(A v B) |- (∀x)A v (∃x)B) is valid in classical logic but invalid intuitionistically [Beall/Restall]
Double negation elimination is not valid in intuitionist logic [Friend]
Showing a disproof is impossible is not a proof, so don't eliminate double negation [Colyvan]
Rejecting double negation elimination undermines reductio proofs [Colyvan]
It is the second-order part of intuitionistic logic which actually negates some classical theorems [Rumfitt]
Intuitionists can accept Double Negation Elimination for decidable propositions [Rumfitt]