more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18156

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 3. Axioms for Geometry ]

Full Idea

A modern axiomatisation of geometry, such as Hilbert's (1899), does not need to claim the existence of real numbers anywhere in its axioms.

Gist of Idea

Modern axioms of geometry do not need the real numbers

Source

David Bostock (Philosophy of Mathematics [2009], 9.B.5.ii)

Book Ref

Bostock,David: 'Philosophy of Mathematics: An Introduction' [Wiley-Blackwell 2009], p.295


A Reaction

This is despite the fact that geometry is reduced to algebra, and the real numbers are the equivalent of continuous lines. Bostock votes for a Greek theory of proportion in this role.

Related Idea

Idea 18150 Actual measurement could never require the precision of the real numbers [Bostock]


The 21 ideas with the same theme [formal starting points for deriving geometry]:

Euclid relied on obvious properties in diagrams, as well as on his axioms [Potter on Euclid]
Euclid's parallel postulate defines unique non-intersecting parallel lines [Euclid, by Friend]
Euclid needs a principle of continuity, saying some lines must intersect [Shapiro on Euclid]
Euclid says we can 'join' two points, but Hilbert says the straight line 'exists' [Euclid, by Bernays]
Modern geometries only accept various parts of the Euclid propositions [Russell on Euclid]
Archimedes defined a straight line as the shortest distance between two points [Archimedes, by Leibniz]
We shouldn't just accept Euclid's axioms, but try to demonstrate them [Leibniz]
Euclid's could be the only viable geometry, if rejection of the parallel line postulate doesn't lead to a contradiction [Benardete,JA on Kant]
The whole of Euclidean geometry derives from a basic equation and transformations [Hilbert]
Euclid axioms concerns possibilities of construction, but Hilbert's assert the existence of objects [Hilbert, by Chihara]
Hilbert's formalisation revealed implicit congruence axioms in Euclid [Hilbert, by Horsten/Pettigrew]
Hilbert's geometry is interesting because it captures Euclid without using real numbers [Hilbert, by Field,H]
Geometry is united by the intuitive axioms of projective geometry [Russell, by Musgrave]
Tarski improved Hilbert's geometry axioms, and without set-theory [Tarski, by Feferman/Feferman]
There are four different possible conventional accounts of geometry [Quine]
Modern axioms of geometry do not need the real numbers [Bostock]
'Metric' axioms uses functions, points and numbers; 'synthetic' axioms give facts about space [Field,H]
Euclid has a unique parallel, spherical geometry has none, and saddle geometry has several [Hart,WD]
Analytic geometry gave space a mathematical structure, which could then have axioms [Chihara]
The culmination of Euclidean geometry was axioms that made all models isomorphic [McGee]
In non-Euclidean geometry, all Euclidean theorems are valid that avoid the fifth postulate [Walicki]