more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18334

[filed under theme 3. Truth / B. Truthmakers / 1. For Truthmakers ]

Full Idea

The two strategies for justifying the truth-maker principle are that it has an explanatory role (for certain philosophical problems and theses), or that it captures the best philosophical intuition of the situation.

Gist of Idea

The truth-maker idea is usually justified by its explanatory power, or intuitive appeal

Source

Adolph Rami (Introduction: Truth and Truth-Making [2009], 04)

Book Ref

'Truth and Truth-Making', ed/tr. Lowe,E.J./Rami,A. [Acumen 2009], p.5


A Reaction

I would go for 'intuitive', but not in the sense of a pure intuition, but with 'intuitive' as a shorthand for overall coherence. To me the appeal of truth-maker is its place in a naturalistic view of reality. I love explanation, but not here.

Related Idea

Idea 18335 There are five problems which the truth-maker theory might solve [Rami]


The 21 ideas from Adolph Rami

The extremes of essentialism are that all properties are essential, or only very trivial ones [Rami]
Unlosable properties are not the same as essential properties [Rami]
Physical possibility is part of metaphysical possibility which is part of logical possibility [Rami]
If it is possible 'for all I know' then it is 'epistemically possible' [Rami]
'Sortal essentialism' says being a particular kind is what is essential [Rami]
An 'individual essence' is possessed uniquely by a particular object [Rami]
Central idea: truths need truthmakers; and possibly all truths have them, and makers entail truths [Rami]
There are five problems which the truth-maker theory might solve [Rami]
The truth-maker idea is usually justified by its explanatory power, or intuitive appeal [Rami]
The truth-making relation can be one-to-one, or many-to-many [Rami]
It seems best to assume different kinds of truth-maker, such as objects, facts, tropes, or events [Rami]
Internal relations depend either on the existence of the relata, or on their properties [Rami]
Truth-making is usually internalist, but the correspondence theory is externalist [Rami]
Correspondence theories assume that truth is a representation relation [Rami]
Truth-makers seem to be states of affairs (plus optional individuals), or individuals and properties [Rami]
Most theorists say that truth-makers necessitate their truths [Rami]
Maybe a truth-maker also works for the entailments of the given truth [Rami]
'Truth supervenes on being' only gives necessary (not sufficient) conditions for contingent truths [Rami]
'Truth supervenes on being' avoids entities as truth-makers for negative truths [Rami]
Deflationist truth is an infinitely disjunctive property [Rami]
Truth-maker theorists should probably reject the converse Barcan formula [Rami]