more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18339

[filed under theme 3. Truth / B. Truthmakers / 2. Truthmaker Relation ]

Full Idea

The truth-making relation can be one-to-one, or many-many. In the latter case, different truths may have the same truth-maker, and one truth may have different truth-makers.

Gist of Idea

The truth-making relation can be one-to-one, or many-to-many

Source

Adolph Rami (Introduction: Truth and Truth-Making [2009], 05)

Book Ref

'Truth and Truth-Making', ed/tr. Lowe,E.J./Rami,A. [Acumen 2009], p.9


A Reaction

'There is at least one cat' obviously has many possible truth-makers. Many statements will be made true by the mere existence of a particular cat (such as 'there is an animal in the room' and 'there is a cat in the room'). Many-many wins?


The 11 ideas with the same theme [how truths relate to their truthmakers]:

The best account of truth-making is isomorphism [Wittgenstein, by Mulligan/Simons/Smith]
Truthmakers are about existential grounding, not about truth [Lewis]
Part-whole is the key relation among truth-makers [Mulligan/Simons/Smith]
Maybe truth-making is an unanalysable primitive, but we can specify principles for it [Smith,B]
Propositions are made true, in virtue of something which explains its truth [Lowe]
Examples show that truth-making is just non-symmetric, not asymmetric [David]
A ground must be about its truth, and not just necessitate it [Merricks]
If truthmaking is classical entailment, then anything whatsoever makes a necessary truth [MacBride]
Truth-maker theory can't cope with non-causal dependence [Liggins]
Moral realism doesn't seem to entail the existence of any things [Cameron]
The truth-making relation can be one-to-one, or many-to-many [Rami]