more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18360

[filed under theme 3. Truth / B. Truthmakers / 4. Truthmaker Necessitarianism ]

Full Idea

Friends of the truth-maker principle usually hold that the following states a crucial necessary condition on truth-making: if x makes y true, then, necessarily, if x exists then y is true.

Gist of Idea

It is assumed that a proposition is necessarily true if its truth-maker exists

Source

Marian David (Truth-making and Correspondence [2009], 2)

Book Ref

'Truth and Truth-Making', ed/tr. Lowe,E.J./Rami,A. [Acumen 2009], p.144


A Reaction

My objection is that the proposition y is taken to pre-exist, primly awaiting the facts that will award it 'truth'. An ontology that contains an infinity of propositions, most of which so far lack a truth-value, is incoherent. You can have x, but no y!


The 12 ideas from 'Truth-making and Correspondence'

Correspondence is symmetric, while truth-making is taken to be asymmetric [David]
Correspondence is an over-ambitious attempt to explain truth-making [David]
Two different propositions can have the same fact as truth-maker [David]
What makes a disjunction true is simpler than the disjunctive fact it names [David]
One proposition can be made true by many different facts [David]
What matters is truth-making (not truth-makers) [David]
It is assumed that a proposition is necessarily true if its truth-maker exists [David]
Examples show that truth-making is just non-symmetric, not asymmetric [David]
Correspondence theorists see facts as the only truth-makers [David]
A reflexive relation entails that the relation can't be asymmetric [David]
Correspondence theory likes ideal languages, that reveal the structure of propositions [David]
If truths are just identical with facts, then truths will make themselves true [David]