more on this theme | more from this text
Full Idea
Cyrenaics place pleasure wholly in motion, whereas Epicurus admits it as a condition.
Gist of Idea
Cyrenaic pleasure is a motion, but Epicurean pleasure is a condition
Source
Diogenes Laertius (Lives of Eminent Philosophers [c.250], 10.28)
Book Ref
Diogenes Laertius: 'Diogenes Laertius', ed/tr. Yonge,C.D. [Henry G. Bohn 1853], p.473
A Reaction
Not a distinction we meet in modern discussions. Do events within the mind count as 'motion'? If so, these two agree. If not, I'd vote for Epicurus.
| 3033 | Induction moves from some truths to similar ones, by contraries or consequents [Diog. Laertius] |
| 3035 | Dialectic involves conversations with short questions and brief answers [Diog. Laertius] |
| 1769 | Cynics believe that when a man wishes for nothing he is like the gods [Diog. Laertius] |
| 3064 | When sceptics say that nothing is definable, or all arguments have an opposite, they are being dogmatic [Diog. Laertius] |
| 1816 | Sceptics say demonstration depends on self-demonstrating things, or indemonstrable things [Diog. Laertius] |
| 1819 | Scepticism has two dogmas: that nothing is definable, and every argument has an opposite argument [Diog. Laertius] |
| 1838 | Cyrenaic pleasure is a motion, but Epicurean pleasure is a condition [Diog. Laertius] |