more on this theme     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18479

[filed under theme 3. Truth / B. Truthmakers / 6. Making Negative Truths ]

Full Idea

We recognise that what makes it true that there is no oil in this engine is different from what makes it true that there are no dodos left.

Gist of Idea

There are different types of truthmakers for different types of negative truth

Source

Fraser MacBride (Truthmakers [2013], 2.1.4.1)

Book Ref

'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.14


A Reaction

This looks like a local particular negation up against a universal negation. I'm not sure there is a big difference between 'my dodo's gone missing' (like my oil), and 'all the dodos have gone permanently missing'.


The 25 ideas from Fraser MacBride

'Multigrade' relations are those lacking a fixed number of relata [MacBride]
It may be that internal relations like proportion exist, because we directly perceive it [MacBride]
Internal relations are fixed by existences, or characters, or supervenience on characters [MacBride]
Numbers are identified by their main properties and relations, involving the successor function [MacBride]
For mathematical objects to be positions, positions themselves must exist first [MacBride]
If truthmaking is classical entailment, then anything whatsoever makes a necessary truth [MacBride]
Different types of 'grounding' seem to have no more than a family resemblance relation [MacBride]
Which has priority - 'grounding' or 'truth-making'? [MacBride]
'Maximalism' says every truth has an actual truthmaker [MacBride]
Does 'this sentence has no truth-maker' have a truth-maker? Reductio suggests it can't have [MacBride]
Russell allows some complex facts, but Wittgenstein only allows atomic facts [MacBride]
'A is F' may not be positive ('is dead'), and 'A is not-F' may not be negative ('is not blind') [MacBride]
There are different types of truthmakers for different types of negative truth [MacBride]
There aren't enough positive states out there to support all the negative truths [MacBride]
Wittgenstein's plan to show there is only logical necessity failed, because of colours [MacBride]
Maybe it only exists if it is a truthmaker (rather than the value of a variable)? [MacBride]
Optimalists say that negative and universal are true 'by default' from the positive truths [MacBride]
Maximalism follows Russell, and optimalism (no negative or universal truthmakers) follows Wittgenstein [MacBride]
The main idea of truth-making is that what a proposition is about is what matters [MacBride]
Phenomenalists, behaviourists and presentists can't supply credible truth-makers [MacBride]
Even idealists could accept truthmakers, as mind-dependent [MacBride]
We might define truth as arising from the truth-maker relation [MacBride]
Maybe 'makes true' is not an active verb, but just a formal connective like 'because'? [MacBride]
Connectives link sentences without linking their meanings [MacBride]
Truthmaker talk of 'something' making sentences true, which presupposes objectual quantification [MacBride]