more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18486

[filed under theme 3. Truth / A. Truth Problems / 2. Defining Truth ]

Full Idea

We might define truth using the truth-maker relation, albeit in a roundabout way, according to the pattern of saying 'S is true' is equivalent to 'there is something which makes S true'.

Gist of Idea

We might define truth as arising from the truth-maker relation

Source

Fraser MacBride (Truthmakers [2013], 3.3)

Book Ref

'Stanford Online Encyclopaedia of Philosophy', ed/tr. Stanford University [plato.stanford.edu], p.23


A Reaction

[MacBride gives it more algebraically, but I prefer English!] You would need to explain 'truth-making' without reference to truth. Horwich objects, reasonably, that ordinary people grasp 'truth' much more clearly than 'truth-making'. Bad idea, I think.


The 20 ideas from 'Truthmakers'

If truthmaking is classical entailment, then anything whatsoever makes a necessary truth [MacBride]
Different types of 'grounding' seem to have no more than a family resemblance relation [MacBride]
Which has priority - 'grounding' or 'truth-making'? [MacBride]
'Maximalism' says every truth has an actual truthmaker [MacBride]
Does 'this sentence has no truth-maker' have a truth-maker? Reductio suggests it can't have [MacBride]
Russell allows some complex facts, but Wittgenstein only allows atomic facts [MacBride]
'A is F' may not be positive ('is dead'), and 'A is not-F' may not be negative ('is not blind') [MacBride]
Wittgenstein's plan to show there is only logical necessity failed, because of colours [MacBride]
There are different types of truthmakers for different types of negative truth [MacBride]
There aren't enough positive states out there to support all the negative truths [MacBride]
Maybe it only exists if it is a truthmaker (rather than the value of a variable)? [MacBride]
Optimalists say that negative and universal are true 'by default' from the positive truths [MacBride]
Maximalism follows Russell, and optimalism (no negative or universal truthmakers) follows Wittgenstein [MacBride]
The main idea of truth-making is that what a proposition is about is what matters [MacBride]
Phenomenalists, behaviourists and presentists can't supply credible truth-makers [MacBride]
Even idealists could accept truthmakers, as mind-dependent [MacBride]
We might define truth as arising from the truth-maker relation [MacBride]
Maybe 'makes true' is not an active verb, but just a formal connective like 'because'? [MacBride]
Connectives link sentences without linking their meanings [MacBride]
Truthmaker talk of 'something' making sentences true, which presupposes objectual quantification [MacBride]