more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18634

[filed under theme 25. Social Practice / B. Equalities / 2. Political equality ]

Full Idea

The prevailing view [of equal opportunity] only recognises differences in social circumstances, while ignoring differences in natural talents (or treating them as if they were a choice). This is an arbitrary limit on the theory's central intuition.

Gist of Idea

Equal opportunity arbitrarily worries about social circumstances, but ignores talents

Source

Will Kymlicka (Contemporary Political Philosophy (1st edn) [1990], 3.2)

Book Ref

Kymlicka,Will: 'Contemporary Political Philosophy (1st edn)' [OUP 1992], p.57


A Reaction

Of course we (society) can do a lot about your social circumstances, but very little about your talents, other than to develop them or thwart them. Talented children need more than mere 'opportunity'.


The 29 ideas from 'Contemporary Political Philosophy (1st edn)'

The quest of the general good is partly undermined by people's past entitlements [Kymlicka]
Utilitarianism is not a decision-procedure; choice of the best procedure is an open question [Kymlicka]
One view says start with equality, and infer equal weight to interests, and hence maximum utility [Kymlicka]
Teleological theories give the good priority over concern for people [Kymlicka]
The most valuable liberties to us need not be the ones with the most freedom [Kymlicka]
The Lockean view of freedom depends on whether you had a right to what is restricted [Kymlicka]
A second view says start with maximising the good, implying aggregation, and hence equality [Kymlicka]
To maximise utility should we double the population, even if life somewhat deteriorates? [Kymlicka]
We shouldn't endorse preferences which reject equality, and show prejudice and selfishness [Kymlicka]
Utilitarianism is no longer a distinctive political position [Kymlicka]
Using utilitarian principles to make decisions encourages cold detachment from people [Kymlicka]
Liberalism tends to give priority to basic liberties [Kymlicka]
Equal opportunities seems fair, because your fate is from your choices, not your circumstances [Kymlicka]
Equal opportunity arbitrarily worries about social circumstances, but ignores talents [Kymlicka]
Utilitarianism is irrational if it tells you to trade in your rights and resources just for benefits [Kymlicka]
Social contract theories are usually rejected because there never was such a contract [Kymlicka]
The difference principles says we must subsidise the costs of other people's choices [Kymlicka]
Libertarians like the free market, but they also think that the free market is just [Kymlicka]
If everyone owned himself, that would prevent slavery [Kymlicka]
Marxists say justice is unneeded in the truly good community [Kymlicka]
Justice corrects social faults, but also expresses respect to individuals as ends [Kymlicka]
Marxists say liberalism is unjust, because it allows exploitation in the sale of labour [Kymlicka]
Communitarian states only encourage fairly orthodox ideas of the good life [Kymlicka]
The 'Kantian' view of the self misses the way it is embedded or situated in society [Kymlicka]
The 'Kantian' self steps back from commitment to its social situation [Kymlicka]
Communitarians say we should pay more attention to our history [Kymlicka]
Ancient freedom was free participation in politics, not private independence of life [Kymlicka]
Modern liberalism has added personal privacy to our personal social lives [Kymlicka]
Maybe the particularist moral thought of women is better than the impartial public thinking of men [Kymlicka]