more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18644

[filed under theme 24. Political Theory / D. Ideologies / 6. Liberalism / c. Liberal equality ]

Full Idea

A state may not use its coercive apparatus for the purposes of getting some citizens to aid others, or in order to prohibit activities to people for their own good or protection.

Gist of Idea

States can't enforce mutual aid on citizens, or interfere for their own good

Source

Robert Nozick (Anarchy,State, and Utopia [1974], Pref)

Book Ref

Nozick,Robert: 'Anarchy,State, and Utopia' [Blackwell 1980], p.-8


A Reaction

You certainly can't apply these principles to children, so becoming an 'adult' seems to be a very profound step in Nozick's account. At what age must we stop interfering with people for their own good. If the state is prohibited, are neighbours also?


The 9 ideas with the same theme [importance of equality with liberalism]:

Minority rights are everyone's rights, because we all have turns in the minority [Constant]
People are improved by egalitarian institutions and habits [Green,TH]
A legitimate system is one accepted as both impartial and reasonably partial [Nagel]
States can't enforce mutual aid on citizens, or interfere for their own good [Nozick]
Liberals are egalitarians, but in varying degrees [Kekes]
Liberal equality concerns rights, and liberal freedom concerns choice of ends [Shorten]
Liberalism asserts maximum freedom, but that must be equal for all participants [Charvet]
Egalitarian liberals prefer equality (either of input or outcome) to liberty [Charvet]
Left-wingers are inconsistent in their essentialist descriptions of social groups [Gopnik]