more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18650

[filed under theme 22. Metaethics / C. The Good / 1. Goodness / c. Right and good ]

Full Idea

Teleological theories take concern for the good (e.g. freedom or utility) as fundamental, and concern for people as derivative.

Gist of Idea

Teleological theories give the good priority over concern for people

Source

Will Kymlicka (Contemporary Political Philosophy (1st edn) [1990], 2.4.a.ii)

Book Ref

Kymlicka,Will: 'Contemporary Political Philosophy (1st edn)' [OUP 1992], p.135


A Reaction

There's a nice fundamental question with which to begin a discussion of value: which matters most - abstract values, or individual people? Placing a collective of people first (Stalinism?) seems to fall between them.


The 12 ideas with the same theme [distinguishing what is good from right action]:

Hobbes shifted from talk of 'the good' to talk of 'rights' [Hobbes, by Tuck]
Is 'productive of happiness' the definition of 'right', or the cause of it? [Ross on Bentham]
Morality originally judged people, and actions only later on [Nietzsche]
For Moore, 'right' is what produces good [Moore,GE, by Ross]
'Right' means 'cause of good result' (hence 'useful'), so the end does justify the means [Moore,GE]
'Right' and 'good' differ in meaning, as in a 'right action' and a 'good man' [Ross]
If there are two equally good acts, they may both be right, but neither a duty [Ross]
In the past 'right' just meant what is conventionally accepted [Ross]
Goodness is a wider concept than just correct ethical conduct [Ross]
Motives decide whether an action is good, and what is done decides whether it was right [Ross]
Rawls defends the priority of right over good [Rawls, by Finlayson]
Teleological theories give the good priority over concern for people [Kymlicka]