more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18729

[filed under theme 12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 4. Sense Data / d. Sense-data problems ]

Full Idea

There is no need of a theory to reconcile what we know about sense data and what we believe about physical objects, because part of what we mean by saying that a penny is round is that we see it as elliptical in such and such conditions.

Gist of Idea

Part of what we mean by stating the facts is the way we tend to experience them

Source

Ludwig Wittgenstein (Lectures 1930-32 (student notes) [1931], C III)

Book Ref

Wittgenstein,Ludwig: 'Lectures in Cambridge 1930-32', ed/tr. Lee,Desmond [Blackwell 1980], p.69


A Reaction

This is an interesting and cunning move to bridge the gap between our representations and reallity. We may surmise how a thing really is, but then be surprised by the sense-data we get from it.


The 35 ideas from 'Lectures 1930-32 (student notes)'

Philosophy tries to be rid of certain intellectual puzzles, irrelevant to daily life [Wittgenstein]
Words of the same kind can be substituted in a proposition without producing nonsense [Wittgenstein]
Words function only in propositions, like levers in a machine [Wittgenstein]
All thought has the logical form of reality [Wittgenstein]
Infinity is not a number, so doesn't say how many; it is the property of a law [Wittgenstein]
Laws of logic are like laws of chess - if you change them, it's just a different game [Wittgenstein]
A person's name doesn't mean their body; bodies don't sit down, and their existence can be denied [Wittgenstein]
Philosophers express puzzlement, but don't clearly state the puzzle [Wittgenstein]
A proposition is any expression which can be significantly negated [Wittgenstein]
Understanding is translation, into action or into other symbols [Wittgenstein]
If an explanation is good, the symbol is used properly in the future [Wittgenstein]
Grammar says that saying 'sound is red' is not false, but nonsense [Wittgenstein]
We already know what we want to know, and analysis gives us no new facts [Wittgenstein]
Using 'green' is a commitment to future usage of 'green' [Wittgenstein]
A machine strikes us as being a rule of movement [Wittgenstein]
Thought is an activity which we perform by the expression of it [Wittgenstein]
Saying 'and' has meaning is just saying it works in a sentence [Wittgenstein]
Explanation gives understanding by revealing the full multiplicity of the thing [Wittgenstein]
Explanation and understanding are the same [Wittgenstein]
We may correctly use 'not' without making the rule explicit [Wittgenstein]
In logic nothing is hidden [Wittgenstein]
A proposition draws a line around the facts which agree with it [Wittgenstein]
For each necessity in the world there is an arbitrary rule of language [Wittgenstein]
The meaning of a proposition is the mode of its verification [Wittgenstein]
Part of what we mean by stating the facts is the way we tend to experience them [Wittgenstein]
The history of philosophy only matters if the subject is a choice between rival theories [Wittgenstein]
We don't need a theory of truth, because we use the word perfectly well [Wittgenstein]
There is no theory of truth, because it isn't a concept [Wittgenstein]
Laws of nature are an aspect of the phenomena, and are just our mode of description [Wittgenstein]
If you remember wrongly, then there must be some other criterion than your remembering [Wittgenstein]
Talking nonsense is not following the rules [Wittgenstein]
Contradiction is between two rules, not between rule and reality [Wittgenstein]
There are no positive or negative facts; these are just the forms of propositions [Wittgenstein]
We don't get 'nearer' to something by adding decimals to 1.1412... (root-2) [Wittgenstein]
We live in sense-data, but talk about physical objects [Wittgenstein]