more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18742

[filed under theme 6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 3. Axioms for Geometry ]

Full Idea

In his formal investigation of Euclidean geometry, Hilbert uncovered congruence axioms that implicitly played a role in Euclid's proofs but were not explicitly recognised.

Gist of Idea

Hilbert's formalisation revealed implicit congruence axioms in Euclid

Source

report of David Hilbert (Foundations of Geometry [1899]) by Horsten,L/Pettigrew,R - Mathematical Methods in Philosophy 2

Book Ref

'Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophical Logic', ed/tr. Horsten,L/Pettigrew,R [Bloomsbury 2014], p.17


A Reaction

The writers are offering this as a good example of the benefits of a precise and formal approach to foundational questions. It's hard to disagree, but dispiriting if you need a PhD in maths before you can start doing philosophy.


The 4 ideas from 'Foundations of Geometry'

Hilbert aimed to eliminate number from geometry [Hilbert, by Hart,WD]
Euclid axioms concerns possibilities of construction, but Hilbert's assert the existence of objects [Hilbert, by Chihara]
Hilbert's formalisation revealed implicit congruence axioms in Euclid [Hilbert, by Horsten/Pettigrew]
Hilbert's geometry is interesting because it captures Euclid without using real numbers [Hilbert, by Field,H]