more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18777

[filed under theme 9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 4. Impossible objects ]

Full Idea

Russell says one won't find the present King of France on the list of bald things, nor on the list of things that are not bald. It would seem that this gives rise to a violation of the law of excluded middle.

Gist of Idea

If the King of France is not bald, and not not-bald, this violates excluded middle

Source

comment on Bertrand Russell (On Denoting [1905]) by Bernard Linsky - Quantification and Descriptions 2

Book Ref

'Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophical Logic', ed/tr. Horsten,L/Pettigrew,R [Bloomsbury 2014], p.86


A Reaction

It's a bit hard to accuse the poor old King of violating a law when he doesn't exist.


The 17 ideas with the same theme [status of 'objects' that can't actually exist]:

Some philosophers say that in some qualified way non-existent things 'are' [Aristotle]
Meinong said all objects of thought (even self-contradictions) have some sort of being [Meinong, by Lycan]
The objects of knowledge are far more numerous than objects which exist [Meinong]
Common sense agrees with Meinong (rather than Russell) that 'Pegasus is a flying horse' is true [Lackey on Russell]
I prefer to deny round squares, and deal with the difficulties by the theory of denoting [Russell]
On Meinong's principles 'the existent round square' has to exist [Russell]
If the King of France is not bald, and not not-bald, this violates excluded middle [Linsky,B on Russell]
Definite descriptions can't unambiguously pick out an object which doesn't exist [Lycan on Quine]
Plantinga proposes necessary existent essences as surrogates for the nonexistent things [Plantinga, by Stalnaker]
There is an object for every set of properties (some of which exist, and others don't) [Parsons,T, by Sawyer]
Predicates can't apply to what doesn't exist [Stalnaker]
Maybe non-existent objects are sets of properties [Lycan]
A Meinongian principle might say that there is an object for any modest class of properties [Rosen]
Fregeans say 'hobbits do not exist' is just 'being a hobbit' is not exemplified [Merricks]
Things that don't exist don't have any properties [Azzouni]
's is non-existent' cannot be said if 's' does not designate [Anderson,CA]
We cannot pick out a thing and deny its existence, but we can say a concept doesn't correspond [Anderson,CA]