more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18787

[filed under theme 4. Formal Logic / E. Nonclassical Logics / 3. Many-Valued Logic ]

Full Idea

One reason for wanting a three-valued logic is to act as a basis of a theory of presupposition.

Gist of Idea

Three-valued logic is useful for a theory of presupposition

Source

Edwin D. Mares (Negation [2014], 3.1)

Book Ref

'Bloomsbury Companion to Philosophical Logic', ed/tr. Horsten,L/Pettigrew,R [Bloomsbury 2014], p.185


A Reaction

[He cites Strawson 1950] The point is that you can get a result when the presupposition does not apply, as in talk of the 'present King of France'.


The 14 ideas from 'Negation'

Inconsistency doesn't prevent us reasoning about some system [Mares]
Standard disjunction and negation force us to accept the principle of bivalence [Mares]
The connectives are studied either through model theory or through proof theory [Mares]
Many-valued logics lack a natural deduction system [Mares]
In classical logic the connectives can be related elegantly, as in De Morgan's laws [Mares]
Excluded middle standardly implies bivalence; attacks use non-contradiction, De M 3, or double negation [Mares]
Consistency is semantic, but non-contradiction is syntactic [Mares]
Three-valued logic is useful for a theory of presupposition [Mares]
For intuitionists there are not numbers and sets, but processes of counting and collecting [Mares]
Intuitionist logic looks best as natural deduction [Mares]
Intuitionism as natural deduction has no rule for negation [Mares]
In 'situation semantics' our main concepts are abstracted from situations [Mares]
Situation semantics for logics: not possible worlds, but information in situations [Mares]
Material implication (and classical logic) considers nothing but truth values for implications [Mares]