more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18794

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / A. Overview of Logic / 1. Overview of Logic ]

Full Idea

The boundaries of logic are determined quite precisely by the fact that logic is the science that exhaustively presents and strictly proves nothing but the formal rules of all thinking.

Gist of Idea

Logic has precise boundaries, and is the formal rules for all thinking

Source

Immanuel Kant (Critique of Pure Reason [1781], B Pref ix)

Book Ref

Kant,Immanuel: 'Critique of Pure Reason', ed/tr. Guyer,P /Wood,A W [CUO 1998], p.106


A Reaction

Presumably it does not give the rules for ridiculous thinking, so more will be required. The interesting bit is the universality of the claim.


The 34 ideas with the same theme [broad views about different systems of logic]:

Logic has precise boundaries, and is the formal rules for all thinking [Kant]
Frege has a judgement stroke (vertical, asserting or judging) and a content stroke (horizontal, expressing) [Frege, by Weiner]
The laws of logic are boundless, so we want the few whose power contains the others [Frege]
Subject-predicate logic (and substance-attribute metaphysics) arise from Aryan languages [Russell]
There are several logics, none of which will ever derive falsehoods from truth [Lewis,CI]
In logic nothing is hidden [Wittgenstein]
We can dispense with self-evidence, if language itself prevents logical mistakes [Jeshion on Wittgenstein]
Logic fills the world, to its limits [Wittgenstein]
Logic concerns everything that is subject to law; the rest is accident [Wittgenstein]
Logic studies consequence, compatibility, contradiction, corroboration, necessitation, grounding.... [Ryle]
In order to select the logic justified by experience, we would need to use a lot of logic [Boghossian on Quine]
My logical grammar has sentences by predication, then negation, conjunction, and existential quantification [Quine]
We can base logic on acceptability, and abandon the Fregean account by truth-preservation [Ellis]
Deduction is justified by the semantics of its metalanguage [Dummett, by Hanna]
Inference not from content, but from the fact that it was said, is 'conversational implicature' [Enderton]
If complex logic requires rules, then so does basic logic [Searle]
We have a theory of logic (implication and inconsistency), but not of inference or reasoning [Harman]
Any two states are logically linked, by being entailed by their conjunction [Harman]
Logic is either for demonstration, or for characterizing structures [Tharp]
Topos theory explains the plurality of possible logics [Badiou]
Logic is the study of sound argument, or of certain artificial languages (or applying the latter to the former) [Hodges,W]
Logic is based on transitions between sentences [Prawitz]
The two main views in philosophy of logic are extensionalism and intensionalism [Jacquette]
Logic describes inferences between sentences expressing possible properties of objects [Jacquette]
Situation theory is logic that takes account of context [Devlin]
There is no 'correct' logic for natural languages [Shapiro]
Logic is the ideal for learning new propositions on the basis of others [Shapiro]
There is a real issue over what is the 'correct' logic [Sider]
'It is raining' and 'it is not raining' can't be legislated, so we can't legislate 'p or ¬p' [Sider]
Logic studies consequence; logical truths are consequences of everything, or nothing [Beall/Restall]
Syllogisms are only logic when they use variables, and not concrete terms [Beall/Restall]
To determine the patterns in logic, one must identify its 'building blocks' [Walicki]
If a sound conclusion comes from two errors that cancel out, the path of the argument must matter [Rumfitt]
Logic is higher-order laws which can expand the range of any sort of deduction [Rumfitt]