more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18818

[filed under theme 19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 7. Meaning Holism / c. Meaning by Role ]

Full Idea

The meaning of a sentence is to be defined by reference to the actions to which asserting it would lead.

Gist of Idea

Sentence meaning is given by the actions to which it would lead

Source

Frank P. Ramsey (Facts and Propositions [1927], p.51), quoted by Ian Rumfitt - The Boundary Stones of Thought

Book Ref

Rumfitt,Ian: 'The Boundary Stones of Thought' [OUP 2015], p.102


A Reaction

I find this idea quite bizarre. Most sentences have no connection to any action or behavior at all. Do we have to ingeniously contrive some possible action? That is the worst sort of behaviourism. See context - Ramsey wasn't stupid!


The 12 ideas with the same theme [meaning is a role in a large network]:

Sentence meaning is given by the actions to which it would lead [Ramsey]
Meaning from use of thoughts, constructed from concepts, which have a role relating to reality [Harman]
Some regard conceptual role semantics as an entirely internal matter [Harman]
The content of thought is relations, between mental states, things in the world, and contexts [Harman]
A particular functional role is what gives content to a thought [Lewis]
The meaning of a representation is its role in thought, perception or decisions [Block]
'Inferential-role semantics' says meaning is determined by role in inference [Fodor]
Very different mental states can share their contents, so content doesn't seem to be constructed from functional role [Fodor]
A term can have not only a sense and a reference, but also a 'computational role' [Brown,JR]
If meaning depends on conceptual role, what properties are needed to do the job? [Boghossian]
'Conceptual role semantics' says terms have meaning from sentences and/or inferences [Boghossian]
Inferential role semantics is an alternative to semantics that connects to the world [Hofweber]