more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18820

[filed under theme 13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 3. Evidentialism / a. Evidence ]

Full Idea

In English, the word 'evidence' behaves as a mass term: we speak of someone's having little evidence for an assertion, and of one thinker's having more evidence than another for a claim. One the other hand, we also speak of 'pieces' of evidence.

Gist of Idea

In English 'evidence' is a mass term, qualified by 'little' and 'more'

Source

Ian Rumfitt (The Boundary Stones of Thought [2015], 5.2)

Book Ref

Rumfitt,Ian: 'The Boundary Stones of Thought' [OUP 2015], p.133


A Reaction

And having 'more' evidence does not mean having a larger number of pieces of evidence, so it really is like an accumulated mass.


The 17 ideas with the same theme [experiences and facts pointing towards knowledge]:

People dislike believing without evidence, and try to avoid it [Reid]
Scientists will give up any conclusion, if experience opposes it [Peirce]
I simply reject evidence, if it is totally contrary to my web of belief [Smart]
We don't distinguish between accepting, and accepting as evidence [Harman]
In the medieval view, only deduction counted as true evidence [Hacking]
Formerly evidence came from people; the new idea was that things provided evidence [Hacking]
How do we distinguish negative from irrelevant evidence, if both match the hypothesis? [Lipton]
Absence of evidence proves nothing, and weird claims need special evidence [McGrew]
Does spotting a new possibility count as evidence? [McGrew]
Every event is highly unlikely (in detail), but may be perfectly plausible [McGrew]
Criminal law needs two separate witnesses, but historians will accept one witness [McGrew]
Maybe all evidence consists of beliefs, rather than of facts [McGrew]
If all evidence is propositional, what is the evidence for the proposition? Do we face a regress? [McGrew]
Several unreliable witnesses can give good support, if they all say the same thing [McGrew]
How we evaluate evidence depends on our background beliefs [Bayne]
Clifford's dictum seems to block our beliefs in morality, politics and philosophy [Bayne]
In English 'evidence' is a mass term, qualified by 'little' and 'more' [Rumfitt]