more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18858

[filed under theme 10. Modality / A. Necessity / 5. Metaphysical Necessity ]

Full Idea

It may be metaphysically necessary in one sense that sets or universals or mereological aggregates exist, while in another sense existence is always a contingent matter.

Gist of Idea

Sets, universals and aggregates may be metaphysically necessary in one sense, but not another

Source

Gideon Rosen (The Limits of Contingency [2006], 10)

Book Ref

'Identity and Modality', ed/tr. MacBride,Fraser [OUP 2006], p.38


A Reaction

This idea depends on Idea 18856 and 18857. Personally I only think mereological aggregates and sets exist when people decide that they exist, so I don't see how they could ever be necessary. I'm unconvinced about his two concepts.

Related Ideas

Idea 18856 Non-Standard Metaphysical Necessity: when ¬P is incompatible with the nature of things [Rosen]

Idea 18857 Standard Metaphysical Necessity: P holds wherever the actual form of the world holds [Rosen]


The 11 ideas from 'The Limits of Contingency'

Metaphysical necessity is absolute and universal; metaphysical possibility is very tolerant [Rosen]
'Metaphysical' modality is the one that makes the necessity or contingency of laws of nature interesting [Rosen]
Something may be necessary because of logic, but is that therefore a special sort of necessity? [Rosen]
Pairing (with Extensionality) guarantees an infinity of sets, just from a single element [Rosen]
A Meinongian principle might say that there is an object for any modest class of properties [Rosen]
A proposition is 'correctly' conceivable if an ominiscient being could conceive it [Rosen]
The MRL view says laws are the theorems of the simplest and strongest account of the world [Rosen]
Combinatorial theories of possibility assume the principles of combination don't change across worlds [Rosen]
Sets, universals and aggregates may be metaphysically necessary in one sense, but not another [Rosen]
Standard Metaphysical Necessity: P holds wherever the actual form of the world holds [Rosen]
Non-Standard Metaphysical Necessity: when ¬P is incompatible with the nature of things [Rosen]