more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18914

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / G. Quantification / 2. Domain of Quantification ]

Full Idea

An alternative, and still controversial, extension of first-order logic is due to Donald Davidson, who allows for quantification over events.

Gist of Idea

Davidson controversially proposed to quantify over events

Source

report of Donald Davidson (The Individuation of Events [1969]) by George Engelbretsen - Trees, Terms and Truth 3

Book Ref

'The Old New Logic', ed/tr. Oderberg,David S. [MIT 2005], p.38


A Reaction

I'm suddenly thinking this is quite an attractive proposal. We need to quantify over facts, or states of affairs, or events, or some such thing, to talk about the world properly. Objects, predicates and sets/parts is too sparse. I like facts.

Related Idea

Idea 8348 If we don't assume that events exist, we cannot make sense of our common talk [Davidson]


The 16 ideas with the same theme [specifying the objects from which quantifiers select]:

De Morgan introduced a 'universe of discourse', to replace Boole's universe of 'all things' [De Morgan, by Walicki]
For Frege the variable ranges over all objects [Frege, by Tait]
Frege's domain for variables is all objects, but modern interpretations first fix the domain [Dummett on Frege]
Frege always, and fatally, neglected the domain of quantification [Dummett on Frege]
With 'extensive connection', boundary elements are not included in domains [Whitehead, by Varzi]
Reference to a totality need not refer to a conjunction of all its elements [Gödel]
Quantifiers are needed to refer to infinitely many objects [Marcus (Barcan)]
Substitutional semantics has no domain of objects, but place-markers for substitutions [Marcus (Barcan)]
Davidson controversially proposed to quantify over events [Davidson, by Engelbretsen]
The main quantifiers extend 'and' and 'or' to infinite domains [Tharp]
If we allow empty domains, we must allow empty names [Bostock]
'∀x x=x' only means 'everything is identical to itself' if the range of 'everything' is fixed [Boolos]
Big logic has one fixed domain, but standard logic has a domain for each interpretation [Mayberry]
Quantifiers for domains and for inference come apart if there are no entities [Hofweber]
We could have unrestricted quantification without having an all-inclusive domain [Rayo/Uzquiano]
Absolute generality is impossible, if there are indefinitely extensible concepts like sets and ordinals [Rayo/Uzquiano]