more on this theme | more from this thinker
Full Idea
The orthodox truthmaker theorist thinks the facts concerning the existence of the truthmakers do not admit of further explanation.
Gist of Idea
The facts about the existence of truthmakers can't have a further explanation
Source
Ross P. Cameron (Truthmaking for Presentists [2011], 6)
Book Ref
'Oxford Studies in Metaphysics Vol.6', ed/tr. Zimmerman,D/Bennett,K [OUP 2011], p.85
A Reaction
It is fairly obvious, I suppose, that not every truth can have a truthmaker, just as the verification principle could not be verified, and you can't perceive your perception in order to check it. Could God withdraw the power of truthmaking?
18923 | The present property 'having been F' says nothing about a thing's intrinsic nature [Cameron] |
18924 | Being polka-dotted is a 'spatial distribution' property [Cameron] |
18930 | Change is instantiation of a non-uniform distributional property, like 'being red-then-orange' [Cameron] |
18927 | Surely if things extend over time, then time itself must be extended? [Cameron] |
18926 | One temporal distibution property grounds our present and past truths [Cameron] |
18929 | We don't want present truthmakers for the past, if they are about to cease to exist! [Cameron] |
18928 | If maximalism is necessary, then that nothing exists has a truthmaker, which it can't have [Cameron] |
18931 | Determinate truths don't need extra truthmakers, just truthmakers that are themselves determinate [Cameron] |
18932 | The facts about the existence of truthmakers can't have a further explanation [Cameron] |