more from this thinker     |     more from this text


Single Idea 18938

[filed under theme 5. Theory of Logic / F. Referring in Logic / 1. Naming / e. Empty names ]

Full Idea

In Frege's account sentences such as 'Pegasus does not exist' will be neither true nor false, since the truth-value of a sentence is its referent, and the referent of a complex expression is determined by the referent of its parts.

Gist of Idea

Frege's compositional account of truth-vaues makes 'Pegasus doesn't exist' neither true nor false

Source

Sarah Sawyer (Empty Names [2012], 2)

Book Ref

'Routledge Companion to Phil of Language', ed/tr. Russell/Graff Faria [Routledge 2015], p.154


A Reaction

We can keep the idea of 'sense', which is very useful for dealing with empty names, but tweak his account of truth-values to evade this problem. I'm thinking that meaning is compositional, but truth-value isn't.

Related Idea

Idea 18937 If sentences have a 'sense', empty name sentences can be understood that way [Frege, by Sawyer]


The 13 ideas with the same theme [name whose object does not exist]:

If sentences have a 'sense', empty name sentences can be understood that way [Frege, by Sawyer]
It is a weakness of natural languages to contain non-denoting names [Frege]
In a logically perfect language every well-formed proper name designates an object [Frege]
Names are meaningless unless there is an object which they designate [Russell]
Russell implies that all sentences containing empty names are false [Sawyer on Russell]
A name has got to name something or it is not a name [Russell]
An expression is only a name if it succeeds in referring to a real object [Bostock]
It is best to say that a name designates iff there is something for it to designate [Sainsbury]
'Pegasus doesn't exist' is false without Pegasus, yet the absence of Pegasus is its truthmaker [Yablo]
Names function the same way, even if there is no object [Azzouni]
Unreflectively, we all assume there are nonexistents, and we can refer to them [Reimer]
Sentences with empty names can be understood, be co-referential, and even be true [Sawyer]
Frege's compositional account of truth-vaues makes 'Pegasus doesn't exist' neither true nor false [Sawyer]