more on this theme     |     more from this thinker


Single Idea 18960

[filed under theme 14. Science / A. Basis of Science / 4. Prediction ]

Full Idea

Scientists want successful predictions in order to confirm their theories; they do not want theories in order to obtain the predictions, which are in some cases of not the slightest interest in themselves.

Gist of Idea

Most predictions are uninteresting, and are only sought in order to confirm a theory

Source

Hilary Putnam (Philosophy of Logic [1971], Ch.8)

Book Ref

Putnam,Hilary: 'Philosophy of Logic' [Routledge 1972], p.72


A Reaction

Equally, we might only care about the prediction, and have no interest at all in the theory. Farmers want weather predictions, not a PhD in meteorology.


The 14 ideas from 'Philosophy of Logic'

The universal syllogism is now expressed as the transitivity of subclasses [Putnam]
For scientific purposes there is a precise concept of 'true-in-L', using set theory [Putnam]
Physics is full of non-physical entities, such as space-vectors [Putnam]
Having a valid form doesn't ensure truth, as it may be meaningless [Putnam]
'⊃' ('if...then') is used with the definition 'Px ⊃ Qx' is short for '¬(Px & ¬Qx)' [Putnam]
Modern notation frees us from Aristotle's restriction of only using two class-names in premises [Putnam]
Before the late 19th century logic was trivialised by not dealing with relations [Putnam]
Asserting first-order validity implicitly involves second-order reference to classes [Putnam]
Nominalism only makes sense if it is materialist [Putnam]
In type theory, 'x ∈ y' is well defined only if x and y are of the appropriate type [Putnam]
Sets larger than the continuum should be studied in an 'if-then' spirit [Putnam]
Most predictions are uninteresting, and are only sought in order to confirm a theory [Putnam]
Unfashionably, I think logic has an empirical foundation [Putnam]
We can identify functions with certain sets - or identify sets with certain functions [Putnam]